Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners in Primary Health Care (PHC) in Riyadh City
Theeb Naif S Alsalem1* and Turki Menwer J Almuhaid2
1Physiotherapist, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2Physiotherapist, Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
*Corresponding author: Theeb Naif S Alsalem, Physiotherapist, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Citation: Alsalem TNS, Almuhaid TMJ. (2023) Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners in Primary Health Care (PHC) in Riyadh City. Adv Clin Med Res. 4(1):1-48.
Received: Feberuary 27, 2023 | Published: March 13, 2023
Copyright© 2023 genesis pub by Alsalem TNS, et al. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License.,This allows others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the authors for the original creation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52793/ACMR.2023.4(1)-49
Abstract
Introduction
The role of physiotherapist is very important in the healthcare system of any country because the focus on the healthcare improvements is the main concern from the last few years. This work is based on the primary data analysis and the primary data have been collected from the participants through the Google form method. The questionnaire has been used to collect the data from the participants that related to physiotherapists and the total 362 respondents are participates in the online survey all of them are physiotherapist working in Riyadh City it lasts for about a month until reach 362 respondents.
Methodology
The Google form method is used for the collection of the data and 362 physiotherapists data have been collected by using the simple random sampling technique in the Riyadh City.
Results
The IBM SPSS and the Microsoft Excel have been used for the analysis of the data with the help of factor analysis and the principal components analysis, along with regression analysis and the correlation analysis. The practical implication of the study is that this work is contributed in the available literature by clearing the role of physiotherapist as health promotion practitioners. The findings are help to develop the effective polices in primary healthcare sector as far as the role of physiotherapist as the health promotion is concerned and it also helps the physiotherapy community to be part of Primary Health Care.
Conclusion
The originality of this research work is that it is one of the fewest and one of the earliest research projects works that conduct to clear the role of health promotion in the primary health care. The health promotion is concerning physiotherapy community as part of primary health care.
Keywords
Riyadh city; Physiotherapist; IBM SPSS; Primary health care; Saudi Arabia.
Variables Abbreviation
Introduction
Managerial Relevance
This research work is clear the picture associated with the role of the physiotherapists in the health care system. The findings of this study help the policymakers and the public to know the importance of physiotherapists as health promotion practitioners in the primary health care system in Riyadh city. Physiotherapists play a key role in primary health care; the role of physiotherapists in health promotion helps to maximize the quality of life. The physiotherapists help in the rehabilitation and the habilitation programs because they can motivate the patients to recover fast.
Review of Literature
The Methodology
Research Approach
Data Analysis
Cronbach’s Alpha
Principal Components Analysis
Correlation Matrix
Descriptive Statistics
Regression Analysis
Analysis and Result
|
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Variance |
Kurtosis |
|
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
|
1. Age |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.01 |
0.149 |
0.022 |
177.978 |
0.256 |
2. Gender |
357 |
1 |
2 |
1.54 |
0.499 |
0.249 |
-1.98 |
0.257 |
3. Marital status |
362 |
1 |
3 |
1.84 |
0.81 |
0.656 |
-1.414 |
0.256 |
4. Level of education |
362 |
1 |
2 |
1.31 |
0.462 |
0.213 |
-1.298 |
0.256 |
5. Occupation |
361 |
1 |
2 |
1.2 |
0.402 |
0.162 |
0.218 |
0.256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Nationality |
361 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
. |
. |
7. Province of Residence |
362 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
. |
. |
Valid N (list wise) |
354 |
|
N |
Range |
Sum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Variance |
Skewness |
|
||
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
|
|
1. Age |
361 |
2 |
365 |
1.01 |
0.008 |
0.149 |
0.022 |
13.379 |
0.128 |
|
2. Gender |
357 |
1 |
551 |
1.54 |
0.026 |
0.499 |
0.249 |
-0.175 |
0.129 |
|
3. Marital status |
362 |
2 |
666 |
1.84 |
0.043 |
0.81 |
0.656 |
0.3 |
0.128 |
|
4. Level of education |
362 |
1 |
473 |
1.31 |
0.024 |
0.462 |
0.213 |
0.842 |
0.128 |
|
5. Occupation |
361 |
1 |
434 |
1.2 |
0.021 |
0.402 |
0.162 |
1.489 |
0.128 |
|
6. Nationality |
361 |
0 |
361 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
. |
. |
|
7. Province of Residence |
362 |
0 |
362 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
. |
. |
|
Valid N (list wise) |
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above mention table are consisting on the range of the variables as far as the demographic variables is concerned. Range values of all the variables are indicates the difference between the largest values to smallest value of the variable. On the other hand, the variance and the Skewness values are indicating that the data are diverse from the mean value because the value of the standard error are indicating that the sample size are not fully represent the population. The value of the standard deviation is indicating that the data are very close to the mean value of the variables.
|
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Variance |
Kurtosis |
||
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
||
1. Physiotherapists have no role to play in the health promotion in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
4.91 |
0.372 |
0.138 |
46.134 |
0.256 |
|
2. Physiotherapists working within district health system should include health promotion in their services in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
1.73 |
0.644 |
0.415 |
2.807 |
0.256 |
|
3. Physiotherapists should responsible for the development of the health promotion polices in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
1.4 |
0.619 |
0.384 |
5.6 |
0.256 |
|
4. There is a need for physiotherapists to shift from a biomedical approach to a model ensuring health promotion in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
3 |
1.49 |
0.582 |
0.339 |
-0.488 |
0.256 |
|
5. The physiotherapists are responsible for the planning of a health promotion polices in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
1.3 |
0.522 |
0.272 |
6.634 |
0.256 |
|
6. Physiotherapists as health promotion practitioners are responsible for evaluation and implementation of health promotion in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
3 |
1.54 |
0.552 |
0.304 |
-0.953 |
0.256 |
|
7. Would physiotherapists educate people on ergonomics in community where you practice in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.33 |
0.538 |
0.289 |
0.857 |
0.256 |
|
8. Would Physiotherapists play a part in arrive alive campaign of the 1 in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
1.53 |
0.596 |
0.355 |
2.579 |
0.256 |
|
9. Would Physiotherapists educate all the clients on healthy diet and need for exercise in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
1.34 |
0.571 |
0.326 |
5.444 |
0.256 |
|
10. Would physiotherapists participate in an advocacy activity to electrify households to reduce burns caused by the use of coal and paraffin in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
4 |
1.53 |
0.553 |
0.305 |
-0.22 |
0.256 |
|
Valid N (listwise) |
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above mention table are consisting on the summary of the first ten variables that have been used for the diffusion of the variables. The number of participants has been changed with the change in the questions, the mean value of the variables is indicating that the most of the participant are agree on the asked statement in the form of questions. The value of the standard error is indicating that the sample size is not fully represent the population. The variance and the standard deviation are indicating that the mean and the individual are different from each other.
The above mention table are indicating that the most of the participant are agree on the statement and the Skewness value indicates that the data is spread from the mean value which means that it is skewed in the both sides. On the other hand, the value of the standard error is indicating that sample are fully represent the whole population. The different statement has different participants because some people are not like to answers all the questions.
|
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Variance |
Kurtosis |
||
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
|
11. Would physiotherapists get involved in the efforts to improve the physical exercise for schoolchildren to reduce the prevalence of obesity and related diseases in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.33 |
0.029 |
0.552 |
0.305 |
1.16 |
0.256 |
12. The physiotherapists advise others to make use of seatbelt to prevent serious injuries in Riyadh City? |
360 |
1 |
5 |
1.51 |
0.03 |
0.578 |
0.334 |
2.433 |
0.256 |
13. Are physiotherapists involved in providing ergonomically appropriate work environment at your workplace in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
5 |
1.31 |
0.029 |
0.549 |
0.302 |
5.963 |
0.256 |
14. Are physiotherapists educating the clients on correct posture and the method of lifting heavy objects in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.48 |
0.029 |
0.553 |
0.306 |
-0.767 |
0.256 |
15. Are physiotherapists educating the clients on not to use sweetened beverage in order to prevent diabetes in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
4 |
1.38 |
0.029 |
0.545 |
0.297 |
0.96 |
0.256 |
16. Physiotherapist services include planning, organization, and the evaluation of health promotion activities in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.47 |
0.029 |
0.548 |
0.3 |
-0.809 |
0.256 |
17. Physiotherapists Exercise are the only means of promoting health in all conditions treated in Riyadh City? |
359 |
1 |
3 |
1.33 |
0.028 |
0.533 |
0.284 |
0.775 |
0.257 |
18. Physiotherapists can facilitate access to the right level of care at the right time in Riyadh City? |
360 |
1 |
3 |
1.45 |
0.029 |
0.541 |
0.293 |
-0.779 |
0.256 |
19. Physiotherapists can minimize the duplication of service and the cost of services in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.4 |
0.029 |
0.559 |
0.313 |
0.057 |
0.256 |
20. Physiotherapists can reduce the number of visits by increasing patient’s commitment and capacity to self-manage through education in Riyadh City? |
362 |
1 |
3 |
1.46 |
0.029 |
0.557 |
0.31 |
-0.589 |
0.256 |
Valid N (list wise) |
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The values of the kurtosis are indicating that the data are positively skewed which means that that most of the data are lies at the right side of the bell curve. The mean value of the most of the variables are indicates that the participant is agree and strongly agree on most of the statement because the mean in most of the causes are les between the one and two. The values of the standard deviation are indicating the data are diverse from the mean values of the most of the variables. The above mention table that consists on the results of the summary statistics are indicates that data of the 11 to 20 variables that have been measured with the help of Liker Scale questionnaire. The value of the range with respect to each question are indicates that the participant responses to the questions have been changed with question to question. The value of the Skewness is indicating the data are not too much divers and lies under the bell shaped in other words we can say that the data are normally distributed.
|
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Variance |
Kurtosis |
||
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Statistic |
Std. Error |
|
21. Physiotherapists can reduce wait times for medical specialists for patient who assessed and screened access have been already in orthopedics, rheumatology and neurosurgery in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.38 |
0.028 |
0.53 |
0.281 |
-0.258 |
0.256 |
22. Physiotherapists can reduce avoidable admissions to hospital and residential care in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.45 |
0.028 |
0.541 |
0.293 |
-0.789 |
0.256 |
23. Physiotherapists can optimize and maintain functioning of independence in those beginning to fail in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.4 |
0.028 |
0.533 |
0.284 |
-0.391 |
0.256 |
24. Physiotherapists can facilitate early discharge in Riyadh City? |
361 |
1 |
3 |
1.38 |
0.027 |
0.52 |
0.27 |
-0.535 |
0.256 |
Valid N (listwise) |
359 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
The summary statistics of the variables from 21 to 24 are indicates that the values of mean are lies between one to two which means that the majority of the participant are agree of strongly agree on the particular questions have been mention in the above mention table. The values of the variance and the standard deviation are indicating that data is not too much diverse and it close the mean value of the variables that have been measured with the help; of questions. The above table are indicating the value of the range and the Skewness of the data shows that the data is not too much diverse because the range of the variables are shows that the range of the values are extracting the form subtracting the small values from the large values.
Results of Correlation Matrix
|
1.PRPHR |
2.PHPSR |
3. PSRPR |
4. PBMHPRC |
5. PRPHRC |
6. PRPHRC |
|
1.PRPHR |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
-0.046 |
-.396** |
-0.085 |
-.301** |
-0.083 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
0.378 |
0 |
0.105 |
0 |
0.116 |
|
N |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
|
2.PHPSR |
Pearson Correlation |
-0.046 |
1 |
.292** |
.251** |
.196** |
.238** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.378 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
N |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
|
3. PSRPR |
Pearson Correlation |
-.396** |
.292** |
1 |
.248** |
.454** |
.167** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0.001 |
|
N |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
|
4. PBMHPRC |
Pearson Correlation |
-0.085 |
.251** |
.248** |
1 |
.174** |
.432** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.105 |
0 |
0 |
|
0.001 |
0 |
|
N |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
|
5. PRPHRC |
Pearson Correlation |
-.301** |
.196** |
.454** |
.174** |
1 |
.183** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.001 |
|
0 |
|
N |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
|
6. PRPHRC |
Pearson Correlation |
-0.083 |
.238** |
.167** |
.432** |
.183** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.116 |
0 |
0.001 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
N |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
362 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Table 6: Correlations (1 to 6 Variables).
|
7. WPECPR |
8. WPACGR |
9. WPCHER |
10. WPEHBUR |
11. WPPODR |
12. PASPIR |
|
7. WPECPR |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
.198** |
.334** |
.173** |
.306** |
0.09 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
0 |
0 |
0.001 |
0 |
0.09 |
|
N |
361 |
361 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
360 |
|
8. WPACGR |
Pearson Correlation |
.198** |
1 |
.105* |
.320** |
0.096 |
.306** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
|
0.046 |
0 |
0.068 |
0 |
|
N |
361 |
362 |
362 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
|
9. WPCHER |
Pearson Correlation |
.334** |
.105* |
1 |
.181** |
.453** |
.222** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0.046 |
|
0.001 |
0 |
0 |
|
N |
361 |
362 |
362 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
|
10. WPEHBUR |
Pearson Correlation |
.173** |
.320** |
.181** |
1 |
.163** |
.566** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.001 |
0 |
0.001 |
|
0.002 |
0 |
|
N |
361 |
361 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
360 |
|
11. WPPODR |
Pearson Correlation |
.306** |
0.096 |
.453** |
.163** |
1 |
.158** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0.068 |
0 |
0.002 |
|
0.003 |
|
N |
360 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
359 |
|
12. PASPIR |
Pearson Correlation |
0.09 |
.306** |
.222** |
.566** |
.158** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.09 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.003 |
|
|
N |
360 |
360 |
360 |
360 |
359 |
360 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
|||||||
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). |
Table 7: Correlations (7 to 12 Variables).
13. PIEAWR |
14. PEPMOR |
15. PCBPR |
16. PSPOEHPR |
17. PEPHCTR |
18. PFRLR |
||
13. PIEAWR |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
0.088 |
.390** |
0.078 |
.412** |
0.051 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.097 |
0 |
0.138 |
0 |
0.332 |
||
N |
362 |
361 |
361 |
361 |
359 |
360 |
|
14. PEPMOR |
Pearson Correlation |
0.088 |
1 |
.118* |
.381** |
.194** |
.346** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.097 |
0.025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
N |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
358 |
360 |
|
15. PCBPR |
Pearson Correlation |
.390** |
.118* |
1 |
.232** |
.352** |
.120* |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0.025 |
0 |
0 |
0.024 |
||
N |
361 |
360 |
361 |
360 |
359 |
359 |
|
16. PSPOEHPR |
Pearson Correlation |
0.078 |
.381** |
.232** |
1 |
.321** |
.352** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.138 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
N |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
358 |
360 |
|
17. PEPHCTR |
Pearson Correlation |
.412** |
.194** |
.352** |
.321** |
1 |
.199** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
N |
359 |
358 |
359 |
358 |
359 |
357 |
|
18. PFRLR |
Pearson Correlation |
0.051 |
.346** |
.120* |
.352** |
.199** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.332 |
0 |
0.024 |
0 |
0 |
||
N |
360 |
360 |
359 |
360 |
357 |
360 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
|||||||
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). |
- |
|||||||
19. PMDSR |
20. PRNICR |
21. PTMSAN |
22. PRAHRC |
23. POMFTBR |
24. PFEDR |
||
19. PMDSR |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
.128* |
.387** |
0.055 |
.413** |
.209** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.015 |
0 |
0.298 |
0 |
0 |
||
N |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
360 |
360 |
|
20. PRNICR |
Pearson Correlation |
.128* |
1 |
.227** |
.356** |
.148** |
.184** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.015 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0.005 |
0 |
|
N |
361 |
362 |
361 |
361 |
361 |
361 |
|
21. PTMSAN |
Pearson Correlation |
.387** |
.227** |
1 |
.189** |
.298** |
.167** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.002 |
||
N |
360 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
360 |
|
22. PRAHRC |
Pearson Correlation |
0.055 |
.356** |
.189** |
1 |
.166** |
.282** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.298 |
0 |
0 |
0.002 |
0 |
||
N |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
360 |
360 |
|
23. POMFTBR |
Pearson Correlation |
.413** |
.148** |
.298** |
.166** |
1 |
.297** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0.005 |
0 |
0.002 |
0 |
||
N |
360 |
361 |
361 |
360 |
361 |
360 |
|
24. PFEDR |
Pearson Correlation |
.209** |
.184** |
.167** |
.282** |
.297** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0 |
0 |
0.002 |
0 |
0 |
||
N |
360 |
361 |
360 |
360 |
360 |
361 |
|
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). |
|||||||
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
The above mention tables, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are shows the degree and the strength of the relationship between the observed variables. The first six variables have been used to extract the association between these variables because the all-variables summary about the correlation are not possible to mention in just one table. The negative association between the two variables means that they are moves in the different direction and increase in the value of one variable are leads to increase the value of the other variables. The Pearson correlation test are also examining the significance of the relationship between the variables. The value of Pearson test is indicating that the if it is less than 0.05 which means that there is significant relationship between the variables while if it is greater than 0.05 which means that there is no association between the variables. The higher value of correlation between two variables means that these two variables are highly and directly associated with each other and it also indicates that the increase in the value of one variable are leads to increase in the value of the other variable.
Results of Reliability Test
|
|
N |
% |
Cases |
Valid |
355 |
98.1 |
|
Excludeda |
7 |
1.9 |
|
Total |
362 |
100 |
Table 10: Case Processing Summary.
Cronbach's Alpha |
N of Items |
|
0.841 |
24 |
|
- |
|||
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
1.PRPHR |
4.92 |
0.309 |
355 |
2.PHPSR |
1.72 |
0.644 |
355 |
3. PSRPR |
1.38 |
0.586 |
355 |
4. PBMHPRC |
1.5 |
0.579 |
355 |
5. PRPHRC |
1.29 |
0.485 |
355 |
6. PRPHRC |
1.54 |
0.548 |
355 |
7. WPECPR |
1.34 |
0.54 |
355 |
8.WPACGR |
1.54 |
0.597 |
355 |
9. WPCHER |
1.32 |
0.515 |
355 |
10. WPEHBUR |
1.53 |
0.538 |
355 |
11. WPPODR |
1.33 |
0.553 |
355 |
12. PASPIR |
1.5 |
0.549 |
355 |
13. PIEAWR |
1.29 |
0.507 |
355 |
14. PEPMOR |
1.49 |
0.554 |
355 |
15. PCBPR |
1.38 |
0.541 |
355 |
16. PSPOEHPR |
1.47 |
0.543 |
355 |
17. PEPHCTR |
1.33 |
0.526 |
355 |
18. PFRLR |
1.45 |
0.542 |
355 |
19. PMDSR |
1.4 |
0.56 |
355 |
20. PRNICR |
1.46 |
0.558 |
355 |
21. PTMSAN |
1.39 |
0.532 |
355 |
22. PRAHRC |
1.45 |
0.542 |
355 |
23. POMFTBR |
1.4 |
0.535 |
355 |
24. PFEDR |
1.39 |
0.521 |
355 |
|
Scale Mean if Item Deleted |
Scale Variance if Item Deleted |
Corrected Item-Total Correlation |
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted |
1.PRPHR |
32.89 |
36.948 |
-0.214 |
0.85 |
2.PHPSR |
36.08 |
33.128 |
0.364 |
0.837 |
3. PSRPR |
36.43 |
33.404 |
0.368 |
0.837 |
4. PBMHPRC |
36.31 |
33.074 |
0.425 |
0.834 |
5. PRPHRC |
36.52 |
33.736 |
0.403 |
0.835 |
6. PRPHRC |
36.27 |
33.164 |
0.44 |
0.834 |
7. WPECPR |
36.47 |
33.16 |
0.449 |
0.833 |
8.WPACGR |
36.27 |
33.095 |
0.406 |
0.835 |
9. WPCHER |
36.48 |
33.674 |
0.385 |
0.836 |
10. WPEHBUR |
36.28 |
33.084 |
0.463 |
0.833 |
11. WPPODR |
36.48 |
33.488 |
0.382 |
0.836 |
12. PASPIR |
36.31 |
33.112 |
0.447 |
0.833 |
13. PIEAWR |
36.52 |
33.725 |
0.383 |
0.836 |
14. PEPMOR |
36.32 |
33.405 |
0.395 |
0.835 |
15. PCBPR |
36.43 |
33.461 |
0.398 |
0.835 |
16. PSPOEHPR |
36.34 |
33.393 |
0.406 |
0.835 |
17. PEPHCTR |
36.48 |
33.132 |
0.467 |
0.833 |
18. PFRLR |
36.35 |
33.224 |
0.436 |
0.834 |
19. PMDSR |
36.41 |
33.146 |
0.431 |
0.834 |
20. PRNICR |
36.34 |
33.243 |
0.417 |
0.835 |
21. PTMSAN |
36.42 |
33.708 |
0.364 |
0.837 |
22. PRAHRC |
36.35 |
33.653 |
0.365 |
0.837 |
23. POMFTBR |
36.41 |
33.124 |
0.46 |
0.833 |
24. PFEDR |
36.42 |
34.019 |
0.321 |
0.838 |
Mean |
Variance |
Std. Deviation |
N of Items |
37.81 |
36.24 |
6.02 |
24 |
The above mention tables that contain the results of the Alpha test are indicates that the 24 observed variables have been used to extract the one latent competent in the form of Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners because it required to check the association with the primary health care and the growth of the primary health care sector have been measured by using the binary variable in the form of dummy variable. The value of the alpha is indicated that the variables are internally reliable and they are moving in the same direction. The 24 items have been used to extract the latent factor and the value of the alpha greater than 0.7 which is the minimum acceptance level and it shows that the variables are internally reliable and they are moves in the same direction.
Results of Factor Analysis (Extraction of Latent Factors)
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. |
0.844 |
|
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity |
Approx. Chi-Square |
2193.06 |
df |
276 |
|
Sig. |
0 |
The value of KMO test and the Bartlett test are indicating that the factor analysis is useful techniques to extract the latent component because the KMO value is greater than 0.6 which means that sample are adequate and represent the population truly.
- |
||
|
Initial |
Extraction |
1.PRPHR |
1 |
0.07 |
2.PHPSR |
1 |
0.172 |
3. PSRPR |
1 |
0.213 |
4. PBMHPRC |
1 |
0.25 |
5. PRPHRC |
1 |
0.23 |
6. PRPHRC |
1 |
0.256 |
7. WPECPR |
1 |
0.292 |
8.WPACGR |
1 |
0.243 |
9. WPCHER |
1 |
0.219 |
10. WPEHBUR |
1 |
0.289 |
11. WPPODR |
1 |
0.225 |
12. PASPIR |
1 |
0.278 |
13. PIEAWR |
1 |
0.215 |
14. PEPMOR |
1 |
0.225 |
15. PCBPR |
1 |
0.22 |
16. PSPOEHPR |
1 |
0.226 |
17. PEPHCTR |
1 |
0.314 |
18. PFRLR |
1 |
0.252 |
19. PMDSR |
1 |
0.256 |
20. PRNICR |
1 |
0.228 |
21. PTMSAN |
1 |
0.183 |
22. PRAHRC |
1 |
0.172 |
23. POMFTBR |
1 |
0.277 |
24. PFEDR |
1 |
0.144 |
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. |
Component |
Initial Eigenvalues |
Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings |
||||
Total |
% of Variance |
Cumulative % |
Total |
% of Variance |
Cumulative % |
|
1 |
5.449 |
22.704 |
22.704 |
5.449 |
22.704 |
22.704 |
2 |
2.671 |
11.128 |
33.832 |
|||
3 |
1.506 |
6.275 |
40.107 |
|||
4 |
1.389 |
5.786 |
45.893 |
|||
5 |
1.091 |
4.547 |
50.44 |
|||
6 |
1.034 |
4.31 |
54.75 |
|||
7 |
0.954 |
3.977 |
58.727 |
|||
8 |
0.909 |
3.787 |
62.514 |
|||
9 |
0.857 |
3.57 |
66.084 |
|||
10 |
0.779 |
3.247 |
69.331 |
|||
11 |
0.71 |
2.958 |
72.29 |
|||
12 |
0.669 |
2.786 |
75.076 |
|||
13 |
0.648 |
2.699 |
77.775 |
|||
14 |
0.621 |
2.587 |
80.362 |
|||
15 |
0.604 |
2.515 |
82.877 |
|||
16 |
0.577 |
2.403 |
85.28 |
|||
17 |
0.529 |
2.206 |
87.486 |
|||
18 |
0.524 |
2.182 |
89.668 |
|||
19 |
0.497 |
2.071 |
91.739 |
|||
20 |
0.461 |
1.922 |
93.661 |
|||
21 |
0.424 |
1.766 |
95.426 |
|||
22 |
0.385 |
1.605 |
97.031 |
|||
23 |
0.366 |
1.525 |
98.556 |
|||
24 |
0.347 |
1.444 |
100 |
|||
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. |
Table 17: Total Variance Explained.
Component |
|
1 |
|
1.PRPHR |
-0.264 |
2.PHPSR |
0.415 |
3. PSRPR |
0.461 |
4. PBMHPRC |
0.5 |
5. PRPHRC |
0.48 |
6. PRPHRC |
0.506 |
7. WPECPR |
0.541 |
8.WPACGR |
0.492 |
9. WPCHER |
0.468 |
10. WPEHBUR |
0.537 |
11. WPPODR |
0.475 |
12. PASPIR |
0.527 |
13. PIEAWR |
0.464 |
14. PEPMOR |
0.474 |
15. PCBPR |
0.469 |
16. PSPOEHPR |
0.476 |
17. PEPHCTR |
0.56 |
18. PFRLR |
0.502 |
19. PMDSR |
0.506 |
20. PRNICR |
0.478 |
21. PTMSAN |
0.427 |
22. PRAHRC |
0.415 |
23. POMFTBR |
0.526 |
24. PFEDR |
0.38 |
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. |
|
a. 1 Components Extracted. |
Table 18: Component Matrixa.
The above mention tables are express the results of the factor analysis which indicates that one component have been extracted with the help of 24 observed items. The values of the communalities are showing the direct association between the observed variables and the latent variable. The one component has been extracted with the help of 24 questions item that asked from the participant in the questionnaire. The most of the variables are positively associated because only the variables that have positive coefficient are included in the analysis and the extraction of the latent variables that not existed in the real way.
Regression Analysis Results
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
1 |
.708a |
0.9 |
0.903 |
0.352 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners |
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
1 |
Regression |
0.003 |
1 |
0.003 |
0.921 |
.005b |
Residual |
43.671 |
353 |
0.124 |
|||
Total |
43.673 |
354 |
||||
a. Dependent Variable: Primary Health Care |
||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners |
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
0.856 |
0.019 |
45.872 |
0 |
|
Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners |
-0.003 |
0.019 |
-0.008 |
-0.144 |
0.005 |
|
a. Dependent Variable: Primary Health Care |
Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners |
Primary Health Care |
||
Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
0.708 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.885 |
||
N |
355 |
355 |
|
Primary Health Care |
Pearson Correlation |
0.708 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
0.885 |
||
N |
355 |
362 |
Table 22: Correlations.
The results of the regression analysis are indicating that there is direct relationship between the Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners and the growth of Primary Health Care because the null hypothesis have been rejected on the basis of the p- value and the alternative hypothesis have been accepted because the p-value is greater than 0.05. The growth of primary health care has been measured with the help of dummy variable and the Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners have been extracted with the help of 24 items that asked from the participant in the form of questions. So, at the end we can say that the role of Physiotherapist as Health Promotion Practitioners in primary health care is significant.
Frequency Analysis
Figure 1: Frequency Analysis of questions (1-4).
Figure 2: Frequency Analysis of questions (5-8).
Figure 3: Frequency Analysis of questions (9-12).
Figure 4: Frequency Analysis of questions (13-16).
Figure 5: Frequency Analysis of questions (17-20).
Figure 6: Frequency Analysis of questions (21-24).
Discussion and Conclusion
This research work is concerned with the physiotherapist as the health promotion practitioners in the primary healthcare of Saudi Arabia by taking the evidence of the Riyadh city. The role of physiotherapist is very important in the healthcare system of any country because the focus on the healthcare improvements is the main concern from the last few years. The primary healthcare is one of the most important sectors in any country and it also important for the individuals. This work is based on the primary data analysis and the primary data have been collected from the participants through the Google form method. The questionnaire has been used to collect the data from the participants that related to physiotherapists and the total 362 respondents are participates in the survey. The participation rate of the participants in the survey have been changed with the changed in the questions that have been asked from the participants.
The number of questions has been asked from the participants of the study and the questionnaire are divided into two major parts which includes the demographic variables and the questions asking about the diffusion of the information. The seven questions related top demographic information of the participants are includes in the study while the 24 questions have been included in the survey that concerned with finding the impact of physiotherapist in the primary healthcare sector. The SPSS (Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences) and the Microsoft excel have been used for the analysis of the data with the help of number of techniques which includes the descriptive statistics and the correlation matrix along with the dimension reduction techniques as well as the reliability test. The frequency and the percentage analysis are also including in the study to determine the frequency of appearing each option as the answer of the asked question.
Discussion
The major finding of the study is suggested that the physiotherapist have a key role in the primary healthcare sector in the Saudi Arabia. The participation rate of the participants has been changed with the change in the questions because the participants are not answer all the question and the number of responses has been fluctuate with the change in the questions. The first questions asked from the participants about the age of the respondents and the answer of the participants are indicates that the large share of the participants in the survey have an age group of 18 years to 25 years. The participation rate is indicating that the 33.8 participants have an age of 26-35 years as far as the participation in the survey with respect to age is concerned. The other age group have a very limited share in the survey because their participation is decreasing with the increase in the participants in the survey.
On the other hand, the female physiotherapist share in the study is greater than the share of the male participants in the survey. The composition of the gender participation is indicating that the female share in the survey is 54.3 percent while the share of the male in the survey is 45.7 percent. It means that the share of the male participants is lower as compared to share of the females’ participants and it indicates that the female are participants in the survey with more encouraged level. In the survey the share of the married individuals is greater than the other option because the data are suggested that the share of married physiotherapist is 32% and it is greater until the divorced data is not appeared in the survey. The 42% share of the survey are consisting on the single individuals and the 20.7% is divorced.
It shows that the single participants are greater than the all-other categories because they have a higher rate as compared to other categories such as the divorced and the singles. On the other hand, when we come to the education level of the participants in the survey find that the participants with the education level of bachelor is greater than the all-other education level because the data are indicating that the bachelor have a share of 68% in the survey while the share of masters in the survey is 30.7%. The share of the other education level in the survey is lower as compared to all other categories of the education. The data of other occupation are indicating that the private sector have a lower share in the survey as compared to the Government sector because the participation rate of the physiotherapist in the survey are indicates that the physiotherapist from government sector is contributing in the survey is 79.8 percent while the share of the private is 20.2%.
The data of the nationality are indicating that the 100 percent participants are contribute in the survey are belong to Saudi Arabia and it means that not a single individual are including in the survey from the other countries. The data of the provinces are indicated that the large share of the participants is coming from Riyadh and the hundred percent participants are belongs to Riyadh city. All the participants of the study are belonging to the Riyadh as the province and it is used as the research area of the study. The composition of the participation rate has been changed of the questions that used to determine the role of the physiotherapist in the health promotion in the Riyadh city of Saudi Arabia. The first questions asked from the participants about the physiotherapist have no role in the health promotion and the answer of the respondents are indicates that most of the participants are comes with the question of the strongly disagree which means that the role of physiotherapist have significant contribution in the health promotion in Riyadh city.
The second question have been asked from the participants about the physiotherapist working within the district health system. The second question asked from the participants about the inclusion of the physiotherapist in the promotion of the healthcare services in the Riyadh city Saudi Arabia. 36.2 percent participation rate are indicating the physiotherapist must be include as the health promotion in the services that provides in the Riyadh city. The 56.4 percent participants are agreeing on the statement that concerned with the district health system that includes the health promotion in the Riyadh city. The share of neutral and the disagree option is very lower which means that the most of the participants are agree and strongly agree about the statement of the question two.
The third questions have been asked from physiotherapist and most of the participants are agree and the strongly agree about the statement that have been from the participants. The share of the neutral is lower as compared to the strongly agree and agree which means that the physiotherapist is responsible for the development of the health promotion policies in the Riyadh city. The most of the participants are agree and strongly agree on the statement the physiotherapist are shift from the biomedical approach to a model ensuring health promotion in Riyadh city. The 55 percent participants are strongly agreeing and the 40 percent are agreed on the statement which means that the physiotherapist in the Riyadh Saudi Arabia are shift from the biomedical approach to the model ensuring health promotion.
The question fifth have been asked from the participants that indicates physiotherapist are responsible for the planning of the health promotion policies in Riyadh City. The 72% participants are strongly agreeing on the statement and the 26 are agree about that which means that the most of the physiotherapists are more responsible for the planning of the health promotion policies in Riyadh City. The physiotherapist as the health practitioners is responsible for the evaluation of the implementation of the health promotion in the city of Riyadh. The 46.6 participants are agreeing and the strongly agree each about the statement that examined that the physiotherapist is responsible for the implementation and the evaluation of the health promotion in Riyadh City.
The physiotherapist is educated people about the ergonomics in the community that have been practices in the Riyadh city. The 70.1 percent participants are strongly agreeing and the 26.6 are agree on the statement that the physiotherapist are educate people about the ergonomics in the community. The statement of the question eight are indicates that the physiotherapist is play an important role in the arrive of the alive campaign of the Government and the most of the participants are agree and the strongly agree about the statement that most of the participants are agree on that physiotherapist play an important role in the campaign that have been launched by the Government. The physiotherapist has been educating all the clients about the exercise in the Riyadh city of Saudi Arabia and it shows that the large share of the participants is strongly agree and the agree on the statement that concerned with the role of physiotherapist about the educating the people about the health diet in Saudi Arabia. The result of the study has been also suggesting that the physiotherapist have been reduced if the burns that arises because of the use of the coal and the paraffin in the Riyadh city in Saudi Arabia. The findings are also suggested that the role of physiotherapist is also important in the efforts that required to improve the physical exercise for school children for the purpose to reducing the prevalence of the obesity and the other related disease.
Conclusion
The primary data analysis has been conducted to find the relationship between the physiotherapist and the primary healthcare sector. The 24 questions have been asked form the participants about the relationship between the primary healthcare and the role of primary healthcare in Saudi Arabia. The different techniques in the form, of correlation matrix, reliability test and the dimension reduction techniques have been used for the analysis of the data. The frequency analysis along with the bar charts are also conduct to find the frequency and the percentage of the participants as far as the answer of the questions is concerned. The results of the study have been indicating that the physiotherapist have been play an important role in the reduction of the obesity because they play a key role in the improvement of the physical activities.
The empirical findings of the study that have been extracted by using the survey data of the study indicates that the physiotherapist is given the education to the public about the use of precautionary to avoid from the injuries that may occur such as the use of the seatbelt in the Riyadh City. The physiotherapist is involved in proving the good environment as far as the working environment is concerned are providing the good working environment is concerned. The data analysis is also indicating that the physiotherapist is educating the client on the correct posture and the method to lifting the heavy objects in the Riyadh city. The most of the participants are strongly agree and agree on the statement that the physiotherapist are providing the sweetened beverage for the purpose prevent the diabetes in the Riyadh city. The physiotherapist is playing a key role in the evaluation of the promotion of the health activities because of the respondents are agree and strongly agree on the statement that the physiotherapist helps in the evaluation of the health promotion activities in the Riyadh city of Saudi Arabia.
This work is also found that the physiotherapist are helps the patients about the early discharge from the hospital in Saudi Arabia. More than half participants are agreeing on that the physiotherapist are play significant role in the early discharge of the patients from the Hospitals. They also provide the optimization and maintaining the functioning of the independence to fall in the Riyadh and the results are also suggest that the physiotherapist is also reduced the rate of admission in the residential care in the city of Riyadh KSA. The reduction in the time associated with the getting the services of the medical experts as far as the specialty is concerned are also depends on the physiotherapist.
Managerial Relevance
The managerial relevance of this research work is that it helps the managers in the primary health care sector to increase the appearance of the physiotherapist and give important to the opinion of the physiotherapist in the decision making. The role of manager is very important in any sector and the situation is not different in the primary healthcare sector. This research work is also helping the managers to make the policy on the basis of the findings and it helps to build the competitive advantages of the primary healthcare sector by using the significant role of physiotherapist.
Scientific Implications
The scientific implication of the study is that it based on the primary data analysis and this work is contribute in the available literature in a significant way. This research work is providing the future research direction in the primary healthcare sector. The findings are help to develop the effective polices in primary healthcare sector as far as the role of physiotherapist as the health promotion is concerned.
Limitations and Scope for Future Research
The limitations of this work are that only applicable in the primary healthcare sector and it only limited to one city of the Riyadh city in KSA. The future research direction is that the research work must be conducted in other cities and overall impact of the physiotherapist on the life expectancy rate.
References
- Akbiyik M, Senturk M. (2019). Assessment Scale of Academic Enablers: A Validity and Reliability Study. Eurasian. J Educ Res. 19(80). 1–26.
- Crisford P, Winzenberg T, Venn A, Schultz M, Aitken D, et al. (2018) Factors associated with physical activity promotion by allied and other non-medical health professionals: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 101(10):1775–85.
- Gustavsson C, Nordqvist M, Bröms K, Jerdén L, Kallings LV, et al. (2018) What is required to facilitate implementation of Swedish physical activity on prescription? – interview study with primary healthcare staff and management. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1).
- Lawson S, Sacks A. (2018) Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Women’s Health Promotion. JMWH. 63(4):410–17.
- Lion A, Vuillemin A, Thornton JS, Theisen D, Stranges S, et al. (2019) Physical activity promotion in primary care: a Utopian quest? Health Promot Int. 34(4):877–86.
- Lowe A, Little wood C, McLean S. (2018) Understanding physical activity promotion in physiotherapy practice: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 35(1):1–7.
- Wahl AK, Opseth G, Nolte S, Osborne RH, Bjørke G, et al. (2018) Is regular use of physiotherapy treatment associated with health locus of control and self-management competency? A study of patients with musculoskeletal disorders undergoing physiotherapy in primary health care. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 36(1):43–47.
- Morris D, Jenkins G. (2018) Preparing Physical and Occupational Therapists to Be Health Promotion Practitioners: A Call for Action. IJERPH.15(2):392.
- Al-Abbad H, Madi S. (2020) Perception of tertiary care clients toward the availability of physical therapy service at primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey. J. Phys Ther Sci.32(5):323–31.
- Al-Ghamdi S, Alajmi M, Al-Gonaim A, Al-Juhayyim S, Al-Qasem S, et al. (2018) Perceptions and attitudes of primary healthcare providers in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia, toward the promotion of physical activity. IJHPE. 56(2):105–19.
- Tran C, Kaila P, Salminen H. (2018) Conditions for inter professional education for students in primary healthcare: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):122.
- Signorelli MC, Taft A, Pereira PPG. (2018) Domestic violence against women, public policies and community health workers in Brazilian Primary Health Care. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 23(1):93–102.
- Al-Wotayan R, Annaka M, Nazar M. (2019) Job Satisfaction and Mental Health among Physicians in Primary Health Care Centers in Kuwait. Health. 11(6):692–10.
- Alhazzani A, Mahfouz A, Abolyazid A, Awadalla N, Ahmed R, et al. (2019) Awareness of stroke among patients attending primary healthcare services in Abha, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Neurosciences, 24(3):214–20.
- Albelbeisi AH, Shehada AK. (2021) The prevalence of physical activity and perceived barriers among health care professionals in Gaza Strip/Palestine. Int J Sci Rep. 7(5):277.
- Alhowimel A, Alodaibi F, Alotaibi M, Alamam D, Fritz J. (2021) The Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used with Low Back Pain and the Attitude of Primary Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia toward Them. Medicina, 57(8):812.
- Alkathiri M, Baraja M, Alaqeel S. (2021) Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding child maltreatment among health care providers working in primary care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Fam Med Prim Care Rev. 10(9):3198.
- Alkhalil B, Oribe Z. (2018) Total Quality Management in Higher Education in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int J Comput Appl. 179(42):30–33.
- Alshammari SA, Alhamdan AA, Bindawas SM, Al-Amoud MM, Al-Orf SM, et al. (2020) Assessing the cognitive status of older adults attending primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Saudi Med J. 41(12):1315–23.
- Alqahtani M, Vaiyapuri A, Seyam M, Shawky G, Muthusamy H, et al. (2019) A Study of Health and Wellness and its Knowledge among Non-Teaching Staffs of College of Applied Medical Sciences, AlMajmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. AJPRHC. 10(3):80–87.
- Alshehri MA, Falemban R, Bukhari RA, Bakhsh HR. (2019) Occupational therapy practitioners’ decision-making preferences, attitudes, awareness and barriers in relation to evidence-based practice implementation in Saudi Arabia. Int J Evid Based Health C.17(2):121–30.
- Hasani F, MacDermid JC, Tang A, Kho M, Alghadir AH, et al. (2020) Knowledge, Attitude and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice among Physiotherapists Working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Healthcare. 8(3): 354.
- Juwita CP, Simanjuntak D. (2021) Behavior of health care professionals to promoting of Physical Activity in the Pandemic Covid-19. Int J Exerc Sci., 7(2):1026–33.
- Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. (2018) A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers. MJMS. 25(6):85–99.
- de Menezes, DQF, Prata DM, Secchi AR, Pinto JC. (2021) A review on robust M-estimators for regression analysis. Comput Chem Eng. 147(1):107254.
- Melariri HI, Kalinda C, Chimbari MJ. (2021) Training, Attitudes, and Practice (TAP) among healthcare professionals in the Nelson Mandela Bay municipality, South Africa: A health promotion and disease prevention perspective. PLOS ONE, 16(11):e0259884.
- Nassir AM, Baazeem A, Saada H, Elkoushy MA, Badr H, et al. (2019) Urological knowledge among primary health care physicians in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 40(5): 483–89.
- Desboulets L. (2018) A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis. Econometrics, 6(4):45.
- SB. (2018) Contextualize of Disaster Nursing Competencies within Resilient Health Care System in Saudi Arabia. NHIJ.2(6).
- Sabo KK, Chin ED, Sethares KA, Hunter Revell SM, Nicholas PK. (2022) Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary healthcare providers with assessing and supporting older informal caregivers. Geriatr Nurs. 44(1):159–66.
- Gomila R. (2020) Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 150(4):7-9.
- Zarei E, Ahmadi F, Sial MS, Hwang J, Thu PA, et al. (2019) Prevalence of Burnout among Primary Health Care Staff and Its Predictors: A Study in Iran. IJERPH. 16(12): 2249.
- Hayes AF, Coutts JJ. (2020) Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures. 14(1):1–24.
- Valaskova K, Kliestik T, Kovacova M. (2018) Management of financial risks in Slovak enterprises using regression analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(1):105–21.
- Zhang W, Koshmanova T. (2021) Exploring Chinese School Principal Experiences and Leadership Practice in Building a Professional Learning Community for Student Achievement. International Journal of Organizational Leadership. 10(4):331–47.
- Yuan Y, Wang M, Zhu Y, Huang X, Xiong X. (2020) Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: A meta-regression analysis. Land Use Policy. 99(1): 104995.
- Silva RG, Figueiredo-Braga M. (2018) Evaluation of the relationships among happiness, stress, anxiety, and depression in pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 10(7): 903–10.
- Nasr M, Giroux B, Dupuis JC. (2021) A novel time-domain polarization filter based on a correlation matrix analysis. GEOPHYSICS. 86(2):V91–V106.
- Mallik RK. (2018) The Exponential Correlation Matrix: Eigen-Analysis and Applications. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. 17(7):4690–05.
- Labrague LJ, McEnroe –Petitte DM, Fronda DC, Obeidat AA. (2018) Interprofessional simulation in undergraduate nursing program: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 67(1):46–55.
- Kumar SU, Sankar S, Kumar DT, Younes S, Younes N, et al. (2021) Molecular dynamics, residue network analysis, and cross-correlation matrix to characterize the deleterious missense mutations in GALE causing galactosemia III. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 79(2):201–19.
- Kennedy I. (2022) Sample Size Determination in Test-Retest and Cronbach Alpha Reliability Estimates. BJCE. 2(1):17–29.
- Heimberger P. (2021) Does economic globalisation promote economic growth? A meta‐analysis. World Econ. 1(1).